A Framework for Considering Your Organization’s Equity Journey

03/30/2021
Download PDF

Summary

"Racial equity journey” and “doing the work” often show up together in discussions about achieving equity in an organization. This framework, created by the Public Equity Group, offers clarity on the journey and the work, and can help your nonprofit map what achieving equity in service of impact could look like across your organization.
Oftentimes phrases such as “racial equity journey” and “doing the work” are paired together in conversations devoted to issues of equity. But what exactly does the journey look like? What do people mean by “doing the work”? 

To help answer those questions, Public Equity Group (PEG), a strategy and management consultant firm that helps mission-driven organizations achieve impact in service of equity, would like organizations to start thinking about their equity work and journey along a continuum. PEG’s John Newsome and Rita Louh, both Bridgespan alumni, have been leading that effort.
 
“A continuum, and its lack of defined start and end points, implies the journey is not entirely linear. Instead, there are shifts, and there is potential to move backwards and forwards,” says Newsome. “A continuum also attempts to be intentional and somewhat nonjudgmental about the journey. Deep change is hard for most organizations, and requires both urgency and self-compassion.” 

Drawing from a decade of client work, PEG’s Equity Continuum is a framework to help organizations map and plan a unique equity journey. The continuum identifies different stages along the journey: 
  • To fulfill our mission, we must do better for participants/clients/grantees/staff of color,
  • To fulfill our mission, equity is (or must become) a top priority, and 
  • To fulfill our mission, equity is (or must become) our purpose and our focus. 

In addition, the framework considers multiple organizational dimensions within those stages. PEG suggests that moving through an equity journey means considering—sometimes at different times or to different depths—how equity is addressed within each of these organizational dimensions.

By viewing the equity journey through stages and dimensions, the framework’s breakthrough is the recognition that an organization may not be in the same stage for each dimension. For instance, a youth development organization may have internalized that students of color deserve greater programmatic focus and attention, given data about persistent underinvestment and disparities, even though the organization’s “governors” (e.g., board members/trustees) may not yet view equity as a top organizational priority.
 
“The process of figuring out where your organization is on each dimension is an important part of the work, as is moving the organization where you want it to be. A framework can help an organization to reflect and set goals, but it is not a recipe,” says Louh. (Bridgespan has used PEG’s Equity Continuum in our organization’s internal racial equity work.) 

When thinking about an organization’s equity journey as a continuum, there are two principles to keep in mind:

  • There’s no universal destination, or “right” starting point: While PEG believes every organization should consider how it can best advance racial equity, it does not think every organization must become “equity focused.” Thus, the continuum is not meant to be seen as a journey from left to right. Instead, part of the work for an organization is to have the internal conversations about the rows and the columns to think about where the organization is now, where it wants to be, and what is required to get there. Likewise, some in the field have argued that an organization’s equity journey should begin with deep, internal reflection, or board engagement, while others have argued that an equity journey should begin with deep community listening and engagement. PEG thinks either is great. “Just start wherever you think you can generate productive leader, staff, and/or community energy and make some progress”.
  • The journey is holistic and iterative: “Like any comprehensive change process, the equity journey consists of successes, failures, and lessons learned, followed by more progress,” says Newsome. The continuum is intended to be used repeatedly over time so that organizations can continue to reflect on their shifts and progress as a whole, and on each strategic and operational dimension. A key consideration during ongoing internal reflection is becoming aware of alignment, or misalignment, within and across organizational dimensions and the organization as a whole.
After an initial appraisal of the organization’s commitment level­—(“Is equity one of our priorities? Is equity a high priority? Is equity our “North Star”?)—the next step requires an honest look at each strategic and organizational dimension to determine the extent of the organization’s current equity focus. An organization should expect to find that it will not be at the same “stage” for every dimension. Resolving the friction that comes from too much misalignment is part of the work of the organization’s equity journey. That process is not easy. Louh reminds leaders that “equity is a change journey for the organization and the individuals involved.”

Cora Daniels is an editorial director working in Bridgespan’s New York office. Carole Matthews is a managing editor working in the Boston office.
 
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available in our Terms and Conditions.

More Articles To Read

Strategy Development 

Pay What It Takes 

Pay What It Takes