Diversity and Inclusion
Careers at Bridgespan
Board of Trustees
Knowledge Advisory Board
For the Media
Building Your Philanthropic Portfolio
Making Big Bets
Partnering with Your Grantees
Creating Strategies for Scaling Impact
Designing Effective Organizations
Areas of Expertise
Children, Youth, and Families
Stories of Impact
Our Stories of Impact
Our latest thought leadership for the nonprofit sector
Explore our extensive catalog of articles, reports, and videos
Key ideas we believe have high potential for impact
Leading voices from inside and outside Bridgespan
Newsletters and Alerts
Get our latest insights delivered to your inbox
The Bridgespan Group
Proposed Regulations May Allow Foundations to Fund Rural Communities More Flexibly Through PRIs
The Bridgespan Group
By Alison Powell
The Chronicle of Philanthropy
on the Obama administration’s attempt to update the laws surrounding program-related investments, a form of impact investing that allows foundations to invest in their charitable missions in ways beyond giving grants. Jonathan Greenblatt, the White House’s Director of the Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation,
this update is the first since PRIs were implemented in 1972.
One element of the Administration’s proposal caught my eye—it seems to expand philanthropies’ ability to work more flexibly in rural communities.
reports that, for example, the new law should support a foundation’s ability to offer “a low-interest loan to a business in a rural area that has been damaged by a natural disaster.” Apparently the original PRI rules were created in a way that focused more investments on “deteriorated urban areas.”
More From the Blog
While new rules are still in the proposal phase and the government is accepting feedback, the focus on rural areas in particular strikes me as apt. A recent report by my colleagues Alex Neuhoff and Andrew Dunckelman, “
Small but Tough: Nonprofits in Rural America
,” illustrates the steep challenge many rural communities face in attracting funding. Despite accounting for 22% of the nation’s poor, rural communities receive only 8% of total nonprofit spending. In addition, in rural America there is only one nonprofit organization for every 50 square miles—compared to one in every half square mile in urban areas. The report calls for more financial support from private and government funding alike. The potential update to PRI laws seem to open up a new avenue for private funders to fund businesses in rural areas. Given the report’s note on the paucity of nonprofits in rural areas, it seems like an extremely interesting opportunity for funders concerned with rural poverty to support and pursue.
Others have reported on the challenge rural communities face in attracting funding, for example, the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy’s "
Rural Philanthropy: Building Dialogue from Within
," Rick Cohen of the
No Surprises, Rural Philanthropy Still Lags Behind
” and the Council on Foundations’ issue paper, “
Rural Philanthropy Growth Act
If you are interested in more thoughts on impact investing, stay tuned for our “Impact Investing FAQ,” which we will publish next week on
Alison Powell is Bridgespan’s Philanthropy Knowledge Manager. Follow her on Twitter
Alex Neuhoff and Andrew Dunckelman contributed to this blog.
is a Partner in Bridgespan’s Youth Development practice area, and Andrew Dunckelman is a Bridgespan Consultant.
comments powered by Disqus.
Related Blog Posts
Recommended Reads for Transformative Scale: September 2016
09/28/2016 | 2 min
Let’s Talk about Sex (Baby): Pushing the Decline in Unintended Pregnancy Even Further
Recommended Reads for Transformative Scale: August 2016
08/24/2016 | 3 min
What’s Your Exit, er, Commitment Strategy?
Matt Forti, One Acre Fund
08/09/2016 | 5 min